James J. Laughlin v. Russell C. Harrington, Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Opinion
Appellant asked specific performance ■of an alleged contract of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to show appellant records, statements, reports, and other documentary evidence regarding a tax •claim against appellant. Since these papers are the property of the United States, the suit is in substance against the United States. The United States has not consented to such a suit. We therefore affirm the judgment dismissing the complaint; of course without prejudice to any remedy appellant may have in the Tax Court where, counsel have informed us, a suit is pending.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
256 F.2d 893 (James J. Laughlin v. Russell C. Harrington, Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.