James J. Laughlin v. H. Clay Espey

317 F.2d 144
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided April 2, 1963·No. 17199·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This unfortunate litigation involving two members of the bar arose out of a law suit in which the parties here, as lawyers, represented the opposing litigants. After the law suit was concluded, instead of laying down their arms and accepting the judgment of the court, appellant and appellee decided to attack each other. The result was a charge against appellant lodged with the United States Attorney by appellee and a similar complaint lodged against appellant with the grievance committee of the bar. Both died aborning, and appellant countercharged in the District Court with this action alleging libel and malicious *145 prosecution. The District Court granted appellee’s motion to dismiss.

While not in complete agreement with all of the reasons orally stated by the District Court, we believe its action dismissing this case was proper and in the interest of both parties.

Affirmed.

FAHY, Circuit Judge, concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James J. Laughlin v. H. Clay Espey, 317 F.2d 144 (D.C. Cir. 1963).

317 F.2d 144 (James J. Laughlin v. H. Clay Espey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.