James Huntsman v. 3M Company

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
• Decided: June 4, 2020
• Docket: 19-3081
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 19-3081 ___________________________

James Richard Huntsman

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

3M Company, a Delaware corporation; 3M Company Employee Retirement Income Plan; Zenith Annette Huntsman; Plan Administrator for the 3M Employee Retirement Income Plan

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________

Submitted: June 1, 2020 Filed: June 4, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________

Before COLLOTON, BEAM, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM. James Huntsman appeals after the district court1 dismissed his action asserting claims related to a series of Minnesota court orders modifying his spousal maintenance obligations. Upon careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Newcombe v. United States, 933 F.3d 915, 917 (8th Cir. 2019) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-