James Hollyfield v. United States

407 F.2d 1326
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 20, 1969
Docket22624
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 407 F.2d 1326 (James Hollyfield v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Hollyfield v. United States, 407 F.2d 1326 (9th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Testimony introduced by the Government supports denial of appellant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained in a search of appellant’s person. The search was incident to arrest. Probable cause for the arrest was given by the marijuana smoking paraphernalia in plain view in the apartment in which the arrest took place. Entry to the apartment was on invitation.

The judge’s comment on the sufficiency of evidence of conspiracy was in no respect improper. The judge was, by appellant’s objection, called upon to rule on the subject. In instructing the jury he advised that in its fact-finding no weight was to be attached to judicial comment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Jerrell Heath
455 F.3d 52 (Second Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Alan Nohara
3 F.3d 1239 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
407 F.2d 1326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-hollyfield-v-united-states-ca9-1969.