James Hill v. Dave Dormire

225 F. App'x 416
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 30, 2007
Docket06-2294
StatusUnpublished

This text of 225 F. App'x 416 (James Hill v. Dave Dormire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Hill v. Dave Dormire, 225 F. App'x 416 (8th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Hill, a Missouri inmate, appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Dave Dormiré, former superintendent at Missouri State Penitentia *417 ry (MSP). We grant Hill leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

Hill alleged that he had been exposed to a number of dangerous environmental conditions at MSP which had caused skin problems, stomach pain, nausea, diarrhea and vomiting. Having carefully reviewed the record, we agree with the district court that Hill offered no evidence that any medical problem he suffered was attributable to the alleged conditions and no evidence that Dormiré was deliberately indifferent to a substantial risk of serious harm to him or other inmates. See Choate v. Lockhart, 7 F.3d 1370, 1373-74 (8th Cir.1993) (to establish Eighth Amendment violation, prisoner must show that alleged condition was objectively sufficiently serious and that prison officials’ actions subjectively demonstrated deliberate indifference to prisoner’s health or safety). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable William A. Knox, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Choate v. Lockhart
7 F.3d 1370 (Eighth Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 F. App'x 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-hill-v-dave-dormire-ca8-2007.