James Henry Ford v. District of Columbia

219 F.2d 769
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMarch 29, 1955
Docket12232-12234
StatusPublished

This text of 219 F.2d 769 (James Henry Ford v. District of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Henry Ford v. District of Columbia, 219 F.2d 769 (D.C. Cir. 1955).

Opinion

219 F.2d 769

95 U.S.App.D.C. 87

James Henry FORD, Appellant,
v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee.

Nos. 12232-12234.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Feb. 9, 1955.
Decided Feb. 17,1955.
Petition for Rehearing Denied March 29, 1955.

Appeals from the Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Mr. Saul G. Lichtenberg, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Albert A. Stern and Homer Brooks, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Robert H. Symonds, Washinton, D.C., entered an appearance for appellant.

Mr. Hubert B. Pair, Asst. Corp. Counsel for the District of Columbia, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Vernon E. West, Corp. Counsel, and Chester H. Gray, Principal Asst. Corp. Counsel, and Harry L. Walker, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER, FAHY and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was found by a jury in the Juvenile Court to be the father of three children born out of wedlock, and was ordered to pay $12.00 per week for their support. On appeal, the Municipal Court of Appeals affirmed. Ford v. District of Columbia, 1954, 102 A.2d 838. On the basis of its opinion, the judgment of that court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Elijah M. Seidenberg v. Martha E. Seidenberg
219 F.2d 769 (D.C. Circuit, 1955)
Ford v. District of Columbia
102 A.2d 838 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 F.2d 769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-henry-ford-v-district-of-columbia-cadc-1955.