James Henry Cole v. Baron Dixon Wal-Mart Department Store

21 F.3d 421, 1994 WL 112760

Opinion

21 F.3d 421
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

James Henry COLE, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Baron DIXON; Wal-Mart Department Store, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-1065.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 17, 1994.
Decided April 4, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert E. Pane, District Judge. (CA-93-862)

James Henry Cole, appellant pro se.

James Clayton Lewis, John Mark Cooper, Croshaw, Siegel, Beale, Hauser & Lewis, Virginia Beach, VA, for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Cole v. Dixon, No. CA-93-862 (E.D. Va. Dec. 7, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* We deny Appellant's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, and we dismiss as moot Appellee's Motion to Dismiss