James Hedman Clark v. Tom A. Mickes

Eighth Circuit

James Hedman Clark v. Tom A. Mickes

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedDecember 27, 2007

Docket06-3135

StatusUnpublished

This text of James Hedman Clark v. Tom A. Mickes (James Hedman Clark v. Tom A. Mickes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James Hedman Clark v. Tom A. Mickes, (8th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________

No. 06-3135 ___________

James Hedman Clark, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Tom A. Mickes, former SSD attorney; * The Law Firm, formerly known as * [UNPUBLISHED] Mickes, Tueth, Kenney, Cooper, * Mohan & Jackstadt; Special School * District; Francis Howell School * District, * * Appellees. * ___________

Submitted: December 11, 2007 Filed: December 27, 2007 ___________

Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

James Hedman Clark appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his civil rights complaint. Upon de novo review, see Reis v. Walker, 491 F.3d 868, 870 (8th Cir. 2007), we agree with the district court that Clark failed to state a claim upon which

1 The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. relief could be granted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also grant appellees’ motions to strike, and we deny Clark’s pending motions. ______________________________

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI