James Haley v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden, San Quentin State Prison
357 F.2d 722, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6918
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 10, 1966
Docket20462_1
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 357 F.2d 722 (James Haley v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden, San Quentin State Prison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
James Haley v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden, San Quentin State Prison, 357 F.2d 722, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6918 (9th Cir. 1966).
Opinion
Appellant seeks relief, by habeas corpus, from state imprisonment following state conviction of the crime of possession of marijuana.
The District Court denied the writ. In its order it noted:
“On page three of the petition filed herein, petitioner states that, ‘the public defender said he would take care of the appeal.’ No appeal was taken, California Rules of Court, Rule 31(a), provides that in a proper ease petitioner may seek relief from his default in failing to file a timely notice of appeal in a criminal case. See People v. Curry, 62 A.C. 211 [62 Cal.2d 207, 42 Cal.Rptr. 17, 397 P.2d 1009] (1965).”
The Court ruled:
“Petitioner has failed to exhaust available state remedies. The petition is, therefore, denied.”
We agree.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Allen Beverley Lembke v. Harold v. Field, Superintendent, California Men's Colony
380 F.2d 383 (Ninth Circuit, 1967)
Loren E. Barry v. Maurice Sigler, Warden, Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex
373 F.2d 835 (Eighth Circuit, 1967)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
357 F.2d 722, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-haley-v-lawrence-e-wilson-warden-san-quentin-state-prison-ca9-1966.