James H. Link Machinery Co. v. Continental Trust Co.
This text of 75 A. 985 (James H. Link Machinery Co. v. Continental Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
January 3, 1910:
The court properly instructed the jury that the agreement under which the plaintiff claimed title to the machinery for which replevin was brought, was on its face a bailment. Whether at the time the agreement was entered into there was an understanding between the parties to it that there was a sale, and the agreement was intended to secure the price, and whether the agreement had been subsequently modified or superseded were questions properly submitted.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
75 A. 985, 227 Pa. 37, 1910 Pa. LEXIS 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-h-link-machinery-co-v-continental-trust-co-pa-1909.