James H. Knowles and Gretchen R. Knowles v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

355 F.2d 931, 17 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 358
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedFebruary 16, 1966
Docket15543_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 355 F.2d 931 (James H. Knowles and Gretchen R. Knowles v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James H. Knowles and Gretchen R. Knowles v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 355 F.2d 931, 17 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 358 (3d Cir. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is substantial evidence on the whole case which supports the Tax Court findings of a value of at least $285 a share on September 23, 1954 for the CHD stock involved and that said stock was transferred to petitioner, James H. Knowles, as compensation for services. We are satisfied that the Tax Court did not err with respect to the Commissioner’s burden of proof and in holding that the deficiency asserted against the petitioners for the year 1954 is not barred by the statute of limitations on assessment.

The decision of the Tax Court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anderson v. Commissioner
1970 T.C. Memo. 271 (U.S. Tax Court, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
355 F.2d 931, 17 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-h-knowles-and-gretchen-r-knowles-v-commissioner-of-internal-ca3-1966.