James Griffis v. Kevin Dale Didway, William Mark Didway, and Emma Gene Didway Griffis
This text of James Griffis v. Kevin Dale Didway, William Mark Didway, and Emma Gene Didway Griffis (James Griffis v. Kevin Dale Didway, William Mark Didway, and Emma Gene Didway Griffis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
§ No. 08-22-00141-CV JAMES GRIFFIS, § Appeal from the Appellant, § 368th District Court v. § of Williamson County, Texas KEVIN DALE DIDWAY, WILLIAM MARK DIDWAY, AND EMMA GENE § (TC# 22-0216-C368) DIDWAY GRIFFIS, § Appellees. § ORDER
On our own motion, and pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P. 39.1, the Court finds that oral argument
in the above styled and numbered cause would not materially aid in the disposition of this cause.
Accordingly, the Court vacates the oral argument setting of February 24, 2023, at 9:00 a.m., and
this cause will be submitted without oral argument on that same date.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of February, 2023.
PER CURIAM
Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James Griffis v. Kevin Dale Didway, William Mark Didway, and Emma Gene Didway Griffis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-griffis-v-kevin-dale-didway-william-mark-didway-and-emma-gene-texapp-2023.