James Green v. Mark Gober

612 F. App'x 858
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedAugust 17, 2015
Docket15-1359
StatusUnpublished

This text of 612 F. App'x 858 (James Green v. Mark Gober) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Green v. Mark Gober, 612 F. App'x 858 (8th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Edward Green, Jr. appeals the district court 1 orders dismissing his claims brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 42 U.S.C. § 1988, and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). Upon de novo review, see Coker v. Ark. State Police, 734 F.3d 838, 841 (8th Cir.2013) (summary judgment); Flores v. United States, 689 F.3d 894, 900 (8th Cir.2012) (subject matter jurisdiction under FTCA), we find no basis for- overturning the district court’s determinations that jurisdiction over Green’s FTCA claims was lacking, and that Green created no jury issues on his section 1983 or Bivens claims. The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Patricio Flores v. United States
689 F.3d 894 (Eighth Circuit, 2012)
Gabriel Coker v. Arkansas State Police
734 F.3d 838 (Eighth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
612 F. App'x 858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-green-v-mark-gober-ca8-2015.