Home/Ninth Circuit/James Gomez v. The United States District Court For The Northern District Of California

James Gomez v. The United States District Court For The Northern District Of California

966 F.2d 465, 92 Daily Journal DAR 7495, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4723, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 12605
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 4, 1992·No. 92-70237·Published

Opinion

966 F.2d 465

James GOMEZ and Daniel Vasquez, Petitioners,
v.
The UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT
OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.
David Fierro, Robert Harris, and Alejandro Gilbert Ruiz,
Real Parties In Interest.

No. 92-70237.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

June 4, 1992.

Prior Report: 9th Cir., 966 F.2d 460.

Before: ALARCON, BRUNETTI and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc and the emergency motion for stay of the mandate filed April 20, 1992, are each denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Gomez v. The United States District Court For The Northern District Of California, 966 F.2d 465, 92 Daily Journal DAR 7495, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4723, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 12605 (9th Cir. 1992).

966 F.2d 465 (James Gomez v. The United States District Court For The Northern District Of California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.