James Goldsmith and Monica Goldsmith v. Pedro J. Garcia, etc.
This text of James Goldsmith and Monica Goldsmith v. Pedro J. Garcia, etc. (James Goldsmith and Monica Goldsmith v. Pedro J. Garcia, etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed April 10, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D22-1692 Lower Tribunal No. 21-6 ________________
James Goldsmith and Monica Goldsmith, Appellants,
vs.
Pedro J. Garcia, etc., et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Pedro P. Echarte, Jr., Judge.
Mark A. Goldstein, for appellants.
Geraldine Bonzon-Keenan, Miami-Dade County Attorney, and Ryan Carlin, Assistant County Attorney, for appellee Pedro J. Garcia, as Property Appraiser of Miami-Dade County.
Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Jones v. Flowers, 547 U.S. 220, 226 (2006) (“Due process does not require that a property owner receive actual notice before
the government may take his property.”); Miles v. Parrish, 199 So. 3d 1046,
1049 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (“There is no requirement that the property
appraiser give the property owner actual notice of the tax lien . . . .”) (quoting
Genesis Ministries, Inc. v. Brown, 186 So. 3d 1074, 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA
2016)).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James Goldsmith and Monica Goldsmith v. Pedro J. Garcia, etc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-goldsmith-and-monica-goldsmith-v-pedro-j-garcia-etc-fladistctapp-2024.