James Goff Hazeltine v. United States

456 F.2d 1313, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10219
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 7, 1972
Docket71-2897
StatusPublished

This text of 456 F.2d 1313 (James Goff Hazeltine v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Goff Hazeltine v. United States, 456 F.2d 1313, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10219 (5th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 1 See Local Rule 21. 2

1

. See N.L.R.B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

2

. Appellant contended in his motion to vacate, 28 U.S.C. § 2255, that (1) his pleas of guilt were induced by promises made by federal agents; (2) he did not understand the charges in the indictment; (3) a factual basis for his plea was never established; (4) he was never informed he could withdraw his Rule 20 consent and plead not guilty; and (5) the indictment was erroneous and insufficient.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
456 F.2d 1313, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-goff-hazeltine-v-united-states-ca5-1972.