James Goff Hazeltine v. United States
This text of 456 F.2d 1313 (James Goff Hazeltine v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed. 1 See Local Rule 21. 2
. See N.L.R.B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.
. Appellant contended in his motion to vacate, 28 U.S.C. § 2255, that (1) his pleas of guilt were induced by promises made by federal agents; (2) he did not understand the charges in the indictment; (3) a factual basis for his plea was never established; (4) he was never informed he could withdraw his Rule 20 consent and plead not guilty; and (5) the indictment was erroneous and insufficient.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
456 F.2d 1313, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-goff-hazeltine-v-united-states-ca5-1972.