James G. Strachan v. Marie J. Starich, Byron K. Barclay, Lori A. Hood, and Hon. James Shoemake (Individually and in His Capacity as Judge, 434th District Court)
This text of James G. Strachan v. Marie J. Starich, Byron K. Barclay, Lori A. Hood, and Hon. James Shoemake (Individually and in His Capacity as Judge, 434th District Court) (James G. Strachan v. Marie J. Starich, Byron K. Barclay, Lori A. Hood, and Hon. James Shoemake (Individually and in His Capacity as Judge, 434th District Court)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 28, 2010.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-10-00803-CV
NO. 14-10-00805-CV
NO. 14-10-00806-CV
JAMES D. STRACHAN AND JAMES G. STRACHAN, Appellants
V.
BYRON K. BARCLAY, LORI A. HOOD, AND THE HONORABLE JAMES H. SHOEMAKE (INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS JUDGE, 434TH DISTRICT COURT), Appellees
On Appeal from the 434th District Court
Fort Bend County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. 08-CV-163648, 05-DCV-146261 & 08-DCV-168631
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
These are attempted appeals from an order signed August 5, 2010. The clerk’s records were filed on September 14, 2010 and September 18, 2010.
Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har‑Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Interlocutory orders may be appealed only if permitted by statute. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). The order appellants attempt to appeal is an order granting attorneys fees and court costs caused by a tertiary recusal motion.
On September 20, 2010, notification was transmitted to the parties of this court’s intention to dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction unless appellants filed a response demonstrating grounds for continuing the appeal on or before October 1, 2010. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).
Appellants filed a motion to extend time to file their brief, but failed to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction over the appeal.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Brown.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James G. Strachan v. Marie J. Starich, Byron K. Barclay, Lori A. Hood, and Hon. James Shoemake (Individually and in His Capacity as Judge, 434th District Court), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-g-strachan-v-marie-j-starich-byron-k-barclay-lori-a-hood-and-texapp-2010.