James G. Lipscomb v. State of Louisiana through the Department of Transportation & Development

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJanuary 18, 2024
Docket2023CW1173
StatusUnknown

This text of James G. Lipscomb v. State of Louisiana through the Department of Transportation & Development (James G. Lipscomb v. State of Louisiana through the Department of Transportation & Development) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James G. Lipscomb v. State of Louisiana through the Department of Transportation & Development, (La. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

JAMES G. LIPSCOMB NO. 2023 CW 1173

VERSUS

STATE OF LOUISIANA THROUGH JANUARY 18, 2024 THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION & DEVELOPMENT

In Re: State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development, applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 667307.

BEFORE: GUIDRY, C.J., WELCH, CHUTZ, LANIER . AND WOLFE, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED. The trial court's August 16, 2023 judgment denying the exception of prescription filed by the State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development, is reversed. Louisiana Revised Statute 23: 303 (D) expressly provides that the one- year prescription applicable to claims filed pursuant to the Louisiana Employment Discrimination Act shall be " suspended during the pendency of any administrative review or investigation" and shall last no longer than six months. The effect of a suspension of prescription is provided in La. C.C. art. 3472, which states "[ t]he period of suspension is not counted toward accrual of prescription. Prescription commences to run again upon the termination of the period of suspension." Thus, plaintiff had, at most, 18 months from the occurrence forming the basis of his claim to file suit. Briggs v. Florida Juvenile Justice Commission, 2017-1189 La. App. 1st Cir. 3/12/18), 244 So.3d 438. Plaintiff's claims regarding his alleged demotion on June 15, 2016, and his claims for failure to promote in August 2016, prescribed on December 15, 2017 and February 28, 2018, respectively. Plaintiff filed this action on March 15, 2018. Therefore, those claims are prescribed under the statute. We hereby grant the exception of prescription filed by State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation and Development for plaintiff's claims which occurred prior to September 15, 2016.

WRC WIL EW

Guidry, C .J. and Welch, J., dissent and would deny the writ.

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Briggs v. Fla. Parishes Juvenile Justice Comm'n
244 So. 3d 438 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
James G. Lipscomb v. State of Louisiana through the Department of Transportation & Development, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-g-lipscomb-v-state-of-louisiana-through-the-department-of-lactapp-2024.