James G. GLOVER Et Al., Appellants, v. ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY Et Al., Appellees

386 F.2d 452, 67 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2521, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4286, 4 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 984, 9 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 461
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 5, 1967
Docket24288_1
StatusPublished

This text of 386 F.2d 452 (James G. GLOVER Et Al., Appellants, v. ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY Et Al., Appellees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James G. GLOVER Et Al., Appellants, v. ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY Et Al., Appellees, 386 F.2d 452, 67 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2521, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4286, 4 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 984, 9 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 461 (5th Cir. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We agree with the opinion and decision of the district court. In addition to the authorities there cited, see Republic Steel Corporation v. Maddox, 1965, 379 U.S. 650, 85 S.Ct. 614, 13 L.Ed.2d 580; Walker v. Southern Railway Co., 1966, 385 U.S. 196, 87 S.Ct. 365, 17 L.Ed.2d 294; Vaca v. Sipes, 1967, 386 U.S. 171, 87 S. Ct. 903, 17 L.Ed.2d 842; Steen v. Local Union No. 163, 6 Cir. 1967, 373 F.2d 519; Howard v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co., 8 Cir. 1966, 361 F.2d 905. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
386 F.2d 452, 67 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2521, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4286, 4 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 984, 9 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-g-glover-et-al-appellants-v-st-louis-san-francisco-railway-ca5-1967.