James G. GLOVER Et Al., Appellants, v. ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY Et Al., Appellees

Fifth Circuit

James G. GLOVER Et Al., Appellants, v. ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY Et Al., Appellees

386 F.2d 452, 67 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2521, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4286, 4 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 984, 9 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 461

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 5, 1967·No. 24288_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We agree with the opinion and decision of the district court. In addition to the authorities there cited, see Republic Steel Corporation v. Maddox, 1965, 379 U.S. 650, 85 S.Ct. 614, 13 L.Ed.2d 580; Walker v. Southern Railway Co., 1966, 385 U.S. 196, 87 S.Ct. 365, 17 L.Ed.2d 294; Vaca v. Sipes, 1967, 386 U.S. 171, 87 S. Ct. 903, 17 L.Ed.2d 842; Steen v. Local Union No. 163, 6 Cir. 1967, 373 F.2d 519; Howard v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co., 8 Cir. 1966, 361 F.2d 905. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We agree with the opinion and decision of the district court. In addition to the authorities there cited, see Republic Steel Corporation v. Maddox, 1965, 379 U.S. 650, 85 S.Ct. 614, 13 L.Ed.2d 580; Walker v. Southern Railway Co., 1966, 385 U.S. 196, 87 S.Ct. 365, 17 L.Ed.2d 294; Vaca v. Sipes, 1967, 386 U.S. 171, 87 S. Ct. 903, 17 L.Ed.2d 842; Steen v. Local Union No. 163, 6 Cir. 1967, 373 F.2d 519; Howard v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co., 8 Cir. 1966, 361 F.2d 905. The judgment is

Affirmed.

James G. GLOVER Et Al., Appellants, v. ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY Et Al., Appellees, 386 F.2d 452, 67 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2521, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4286, 4 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 984, 9 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 461 (5th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

386 F.2d 452 (James G. GLOVER Et Al., Appellants, v. ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY Et Al., Appellees) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related