James Fudge v. Grant Harris

671 F. App'x 398

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate James Fudge appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment on his due process ciaim related to his ongoing segregated confinement. After carefully reviewing the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the district court’s decision was proper. See Beaulieu v. Ludeman, 690 F.3d 1017, 1024 (8th Cir. 2012) (grant of summary judgment reviewed de novo); Rahman X v. Morgan, 300 F.3d 970, 973-74 (8th Cir. 2002) (discussing due process requirements related to ongoing confinement in administrative segregation). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1 . The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the proposed findings and recommendations of the Honorable Jerome T. Kearney, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.