James Fudge v. Grant Harris
This text of 671 F. App'x 398 (James Fudge v. Grant Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Arkansas inmate James Fudge appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment on his due process ciaim related to his ongoing segregated confinement. After carefully reviewing the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the district court’s decision was proper. See Beaulieu v. Ludeman, 690 F.3d 1017, 1024 (8th Cir. 2012) (grant of summary judgment reviewed de novo); Rahman X v. Morgan, 300 F.3d 970, 973-74 (8th Cir. 2002) (discussing due process requirements related to ongoing confinement in administrative segregation). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the proposed findings and recommendations of the Honorable Jerome T. Kearney, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
671 F. App'x 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-fudge-v-grant-harris-ca8-2016.