James Frederick Grimes v. Gary Franklin Grimes

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 26, 2000·No. 04-99-00318-CV·Published

Opinion

99-00318 Grimes v Grimes.wpd
No. 04-99-00318-CV
James Frederick GRIMES,
Appellant
v.
Gary Franklin GRIMES,
Appellee
From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 98-CI-08224
Honorable Andy Mireles, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice

Sarah B. Duncan, Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 26, 2000

APPEAL DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

James Frederick Grimes appeals the trial court's judgment signed March 25, 1999. Appellant's brief was due December 9, 1999. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time were filed. On December 21, 1999, we therefore ordered James Frederick Grimes to file, on or before January 7, 2000, his appellant's brief and a written response reasonably explaining his failure to timely file the brief and showing why appellee is not significantly injured by appellant's failure to timely file a brief. We further advised appellant that if he failed to file a brief and the written response by the date ordered, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a). Appellant has not filed a brief and the written response ordered by the court.

We therefore order this appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. We further order that appellee, Gary Franklin Grimes, recover his costs in this appeal from James Frederick Grimes.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Frederick Grimes v. Gary Franklin Grimes, (Tex. Ct. App. 2000).

James Frederick Grimes v. Gary Franklin Grimes (James Frederick Grimes v. Gary Franklin Grimes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.