James Frederick Grimes v. Gary Franklin Grimes
This text of James Frederick Grimes v. Gary Franklin Grimes (James Frederick Grimes v. Gary Franklin Grimes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice
Sarah B. Duncan, Justice
Karen Angelini, Justice
Delivered and Filed: January 26, 2000
APPEAL DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
James Frederick Grimes appeals the trial court's judgment signed March 25, 1999. Appellant's brief was due December 9, 1999. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time were filed. On December 21, 1999, we therefore ordered James Frederick Grimes to file, on or before January 7, 2000, his appellant's brief and a written response reasonably explaining his failure to timely file the brief and showing why appellee is not significantly injured by appellant's failure to timely file a brief. We further advised appellant that if he failed to file a brief and the written response by the date ordered, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a). Appellant has not filed a brief and the written response ordered by the court.
We therefore order this appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. We further order that appellee, Gary Franklin Grimes, recover his costs in this appeal from James Frederick Grimes.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James Frederick Grimes v. Gary Franklin Grimes, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-frederick-grimes-v-gary-franklin-grimes-texapp-2000.