James Francis Jenkins v. United States

Third Circuit

James Francis Jenkins v. United States

348 F.2d 470, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5177

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided June 21, 1965·No. 15168_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The present appeal of this appellant based on the assertion that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel due to the presence of two United States Deputy Marshals in the room where he consulted with his attorney prior to changing his plea to guilty on January 4, 1960, is utterly without merit.

The judgment of the lower court will be affirmed on the Memorandum and Order of Judge John W. Lord, Jr. of October 8, 1964, D.C., 243 F.Supp. 401.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The present appeal of this appellant based on the assertion that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel due to the presence of two United States Deputy Marshals in the room where he consulted with his attorney prior to changing his plea to guilty on January 4, 1960, is utterly without merit.

The judgment of the lower court will be affirmed on the Memorandum and Order of Judge John W. Lord, Jr. of October 8, 1964, D.C., 243 F.Supp. 401.

James Francis Jenkins v. United States, 348 F.2d 470, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5177 (3d Cir. 1965).

Pincite

348 F.2d 470 (James Francis Jenkins v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related