James Francis Hill v. United States

282 F.2d 352, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4278
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJune 14, 1960
Docket14164_1
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 282 F.2d 352 (James Francis Hill v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Francis Hill v. United States, 282 F.2d 352, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4278 (6th Cir. 1960).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard on the record, the briefs of the parties and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised:

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order of the District Court denying petitioner’s motion to vacate sentences be and is hereby affirmed on the opinion of Judge Robert L. Taylor, 186 F.Supp. 441.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

James Francis Hill v. United States
378 F.2d 44 (Sixth Circuit, 1967)
Hill v. United States
236 F. Supp. 155 (E.D. Tennessee, 1964)
United States v. James Francis Hill
319 F.2d 653 (Sixth Circuit, 1963)
Hill v. United States
368 U.S. 424 (Supreme Court, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
282 F.2d 352, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-francis-hill-v-united-states-ca6-1960.