JAMES FORNEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
JAMES FORNEY, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D17-3854
[February 28, 2018]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ilona M. Holmes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 04-990 CF10A.
James Forney, Raiford, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the summary denial of appellant’s successive rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. We write only to address appellant’s claim that the orders entered after he filed a motion to disqualify the trial judge were void. This claim is meritless because appellant failed to serve the motion on the judge. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(c), (j); Braddy v. State, 111 So. 3d 810, 833 (Fla. 2012); Hedrick v. State, 6 So. 3d 688, 693 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).
Affirmed.
WARNER, CIKLIN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
JAMES FORNEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA (JAMES FORNEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.