JAMES FORNEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of JAMES FORNEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA (JAMES FORNEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
JAMES FORNEY, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D17-3854
[February 28, 2018]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ilona M. Holmes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 04-990 CF10A.
James Forney, Raiford, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the summary denial of appellant’s successive rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. We write only to address appellant’s claim that the orders entered after he filed a motion to disqualify the trial judge were void. This claim is meritless because appellant failed to serve the motion on the judge. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(c), (j); Braddy v. State, 111 So. 3d 810, 833 (Fla. 2012); Hedrick v. State, 6 So. 3d 688, 693 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).
Affirmed.
WARNER, CIKLIN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
JAMES FORNEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-forney-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2018.