James Forman v. City of Montgomery
This text of 355 F.2d 930 (James Forman v. City of Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
355 F.2d 930
James FORMAN et al., Appellants,
v.
CITY OF MONTGOMERY, Appellee.
No. 22961.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 17, 1966.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama; Frank M. Johnson, Jr., Judge.
Martin M. Berger, Arthur Kinoy, William M. Kunstler, New York City, for appellants.
Walter J. Knabe and Matthis W. Piel, Montgomery, Ala., Capell, Howard, Knabe & Cobbs, Montgomery, Ala., of counsel, for appellee.
Before RIVES and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, and ALLGOOD, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons well stated in the opinion of the district court. 245 F.Supp. 17 (1965).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
355 F.2d 930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-forman-v-city-of-montgomery-ca5-1966.