James Forbit v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 14, 2020·No. 05-19-00946-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered January 14, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00946-CR

JAMES FORBIT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F18-52005-Q

ORDER

After the Court granted a motion for extension of time, appellant’s brief was due October

25, 2019. When it was not filed, we notified appellant by postcard dated October 29, 2019 and directed him to file a brief and a motion to extend time to file the same. To date, no brief or motion has been filed, nor have we had any communication from appellate counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, whether appellant has abandoned the appeal, or whether appointed counsel has abandoned the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within TWENTY DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Tammy Kemp, Presiding Judge, 204th Judicial District Court; to J. Daniel Oliphant; and to the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office, Appellate Division.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated twenty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE

JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Forbit v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

James Forbit v. State (James Forbit v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meza v. State
742 S.W.2d 708 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)