James F. Turner, Adm'r v. Hiwassee Land Company

Sixth Circuit

James F. Turner, Adm'r v. Hiwassee Land Company

265 F.2d 929, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4006

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedApril 21, 1959

Docket13740

StatusPublished

This text of 265 F.2d 929 (James F. Turner, Adm'r v. Hiwassee Land Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James F. Turner, Adm'r v. Hiwassee Land Company, 265 F.2d 929, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4006 (6th Cir. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on appeal of the plaintiff in the district court from the denial of his motion under Rule 60(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., for leave to file a motion to vacate the judgment of directed verdict for the defendant, entered in the district court on March 13, 1958;

And this court, having duly considered the oral arguments and the briefs of the attorneys and the record in the case, is of opinion that, for the reasons stated by District Judge Darr in his succinct opinion, the motion was properly denied.

It is, accordingly, ordered that the judgment of the district court in denying plaintiff’s motion be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on appeal of the plaintiff in the district court from the denial of his motion under Rule 60(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., for leave to file a motion to vacate the judgment of directed verdict for the defendant, entered in the district court on March 13, 1958;

And this court, having duly considered the oral arguments and the briefs of the attorneys and the record in the case, is of opinion that, for the reasons stated by District Judge Darr in his succinct opinion, the motion was properly denied.

It is, accordingly, ordered that the judgment of the district court in denying plaintiff’s motion be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 F.2d 929, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-f-turner-admr-v-hiwassee-land-company-ca6-1959.