James F. Johnson v. Thomas Kindt, Warden and U.S. Parole Commission, District of Columbia, Amicus Curiae
This text of 153 F.3d 727 (James F. Johnson v. Thomas Kindt, Warden and U.S. Parole Commission, District of Columbia, Amicus Curiae) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
153 F.3d 727w
98 CJ C.A.R. 3995
NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.
James F. JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
Thomas KINDT, Warden and U.S. Parole Commission,
Respondents-Appellants.
District of Columbia, Amicus Curiae.
No. 96-6154.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
July 17, 1998.
NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
153 F.3d 727, 1998 WL 440283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-f-johnson-v-thomas-kindt-warden-and-us-parol-ca10-1998.