James F. Gallagher and Junior Lynn Sherman v. Commonwealth of Kentucky W. Jess Buchanan, Warden Kentucky State Penitentiary, Eddyville, Kentucky

Sixth Circuit

James F. Gallagher and Junior Lynn Sherman v. Commonwealth of Kentucky W. Jess Buchanan, Warden Kentucky State Penitentiary, Eddyville, Kentucky

224 F.2d 559, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4118

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJune 4, 1955

Docket12350_1

StatusPublished

This text of 224 F.2d 559 (James F. Gallagher and Junior Lynn Sherman v. Commonwealth of Kentucky W. Jess Buchanan, Warden Kentucky State Penitentiary, Eddyville, Kentucky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James F. Gallagher and Junior Lynn Sherman v. Commonwealth of Kentucky W. Jess Buchanan, Warden Kentucky State Penitentiary, Eddyville, Kentucky, 224 F.2d 559, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4118 (6th Cir. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon an appeal from denial of appellants’ petition for a writ of habeas corpus by the district court, and it appearing that appellants were convicted in the Fayette Circuit Court of the State of Kentucky and that their petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the district court was filed before they had exhausted their remedies under the laws of the State of Kentucky, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the order of the district court denying appellants’ petition for a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that they have not exhausted the remedies available to them in the courts of the State of Kentucky is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon an appeal from denial of appellants’ petition for a writ of habeas corpus by the district court, and it appearing that appellants were convicted in the Fayette Circuit Court of the State of Kentucky and that their petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the district court was filed before they had exhausted their remedies under the laws of the State of Kentucky, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the order of the district court denying appellants’ petition for a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that they have not exhausted the remedies available to them in the courts of the State of Kentucky is hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

224 F.2d 559, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-f-gallagher-and-junior-lynn-sherman-v-commonwealth-of-kentucky-w-ca6-1955.