James F. Anderson Dorothy J. Anderson v. Farmers Home Administration Robert J. Maag Steve Magedanz Tim Potts Thomas A. Lloyd

24 F.3d 242, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18352, 1994 WL 159794
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 2, 1994
Docket93-3719
StatusPublished

This text of 24 F.3d 242 (James F. Anderson Dorothy J. Anderson v. Farmers Home Administration Robert J. Maag Steve Magedanz Tim Potts Thomas A. Lloyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James F. Anderson Dorothy J. Anderson v. Farmers Home Administration Robert J. Maag Steve Magedanz Tim Potts Thomas A. Lloyd, 24 F.3d 242, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18352, 1994 WL 159794 (8th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

24 F.3d 242
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

James F. ANDERSON; Dorothy J. Anderson, Appellants,
v.
FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION; Robert J. Maag; Steve
Magedanz; Tim Potts; Thomas A. Lloyd, Appellees.

No. 93-3719.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: April 25, 1994.
Filed: May 2, 1994.

Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

James F. and Dorothy J. Anderson, South Dakota farmers, appeal the district court's order dismissing without prejudice their complaint against the Farmers Home Administration and others. We affirm.

The Andersons filed a 138-page complaint consisting of political statements and allegations describing in vague terms various wrongs allegedly inflicted on the Andersons. The district court granted defendants' motion to strike the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8.

A pleading must contain "a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief." Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). Having carefully reviewed the complaint and the record, we see no abuse of discretion in the district court's decision to dismiss the Andersons' complaint without prejudice. See Atkins v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 967 F.2d 1197, 1203 (8th Cir. 1992).

Accordingly, we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atkins v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.
967 F.2d 1197 (Eighth Circuit, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 F.3d 242, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18352, 1994 WL 159794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-f-anderson-dorothy-j-anderson-v-farmers-home-ca8-1994.