James Eric Higginbotham v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in James Eric Higginbotham v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 14429
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 7, 2013·No. 01-12-00547-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: James Eric Higginbotham v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-12-00547-CR

Trial court case number: 1773747

Trial court: County Criminal Court at Law No. 3 of Harris County

In order to properly withdraw from representing a party in this Court, an attorney must file a motion that complies with the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5, including delivering the motion to the party either in person or by both certified and first-class mail to the party’s last known address. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(b), (d). The “Notice of Substitution of Counsel” filed on May 6, 2013 in this appeal does not indicate that the withdrawing attorney complied with this requirement of Rule 6.5. Accordingly, we STRIKE the notice and the “Unopposed Motion for Continuance of Time to File Appellant’s Brief” filed by Gene Tausk, without prejudice to refiling if a compliant motion to withdraw and substitute is filed and granted. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: May 7, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Eric Higginbotham v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

James Eric Higginbotham v. State (James Eric Higginbotham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.