James & Elizabeth Carlson v. City of Houston

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in James & Elizabeth Carlson v. City of Houston. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 5414
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 2, 2013·No. 14-12-00099-CV·Published

Opinion

May 2, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals JAMES & ELIZABETH CARLSON, JOSE & ELIZABETH REFERENTE, ROGER CAMPODONICO, SERGIO A. LOPEZ, YAN WANG, HUI YAO, DANIEL & ANDREA SELUK, ROBERT HUTCHINS, ROBERT & KELLY FARFAN, BONNIE CORBETT, HELEN PAGOLA, & MANNY ESPINOLA, Appellants

NO. 14-12-00099-CV V.

CITY OF HOUSTON, Appellee

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, City of Houston, signed January 13, 2012, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the judgment of the court below REVERSED and REMAND the cause for proceedings in accordance with the court's opinion.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellee, City of Houston.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James & Elizabeth Carlson v. City of Houston, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

James & Elizabeth Carlson v. City of Houston (James & Elizabeth Carlson v. City of Houston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.