James Edward Thomas v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 5, 2019
Docket13-19-00289-CR
StatusPublished

This text of James Edward Thomas v. State (James Edward Thomas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Edward Thomas v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-19-00289-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

JAMES EDWARD THOMAS, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 272nd District Court of Brazos County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion by Justice Perkes

Appellant James Edward Thomas, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion

to dismiss his appeal1 because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.2(a). We have not issued a decision in this appeal and the motion to dismiss is

1 His appeal was transferred to this Court from the Fourteenth Court of Appeals by order of the Texas Supreme Court. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.220(a) (delineating the jurisdiction of appellate courts); id. § 73.001 (granting the supreme court the authority to transfer cases from one court of appeals to another at any time that there is “good cause” for the transfer). signed by both appellant and his attorney. See id. The motion to dismiss thus meets

the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id.

Accordingly, without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to

dismiss and we dismiss the appeal. See id.; Arthur v. State, 542 S.W.3d 822, 822 (Tex.

App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2018, no pet.) (per curiam). Having dismissed the appeal at

appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will

issue forthwith.

GREGORY T. PERKES Justice

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 5th day of September, 2019.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arthur v. State
542 S.W.3d 822 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
James Edward Thomas v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-edward-thomas-v-state-texapp-2019.