James Edward Padgett v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida

Fifth Circuit

James Edward Padgett v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida

387 F.2d 387

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 6, 1968

Docket24720

StatusPublished

This text of 387 F.2d 387 (James Edward Padgett v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James Edward Padgett v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, 387 F.2d 387 (5th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appellant from denial of a writ of habeas corpus is a Florida State convict serving a life sentence imposed upon conviction for first degree murder. There was no direct appeal, but the appellant exhausted his State post-conviction remedies as is required by 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254.

Following a full evidentiary hearing, the United States District Court granted habeas corpus relief on the authority of Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977 (1963). This Court reversed because Escobedo is not retrospective in effect, Johnson v. State of New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719, 86 S.Ct. 1772, 16 L.Ed.2d 882 (1966), but remanded for adjudication of the issue of voluntariness of the alleged confession under pr e-Escobedo standards. Wainwright v. Padgett, 5 Cir., 1966, 363 F.2d 822.

In obedience to our mandate, the District Court held another evidentiary hearing at which the appellant and other witnesses testified. The habeas corpus was then denied for the reason that the District Court found appellant’s signed statement of July 15, 1959, to have been voluntarily made. A review of this voluminous record convinces us that the judgment should be affirmed, Smith v. Heard, 5 Cir., 1963, 315 F.2d 692.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This appellant from denial of a writ of habeas corpus is a Florida State convict serving a life sentence imposed upon conviction for first degree murder. There was no direct appeal, but the appellant exhausted his State post-conviction remedies as is required by 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254.

Following a full evidentiary hearing, the United States District Court granted habeas corpus relief on the authority of Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977 (1963). This Court reversed because Escobedo is not retrospective in effect, Johnson v. State of New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719, 86 S.Ct. 1772, 16 L.Ed.2d 882 (1966), but remanded for adjudication of the issue of voluntariness of the alleged confession under pr e-Escobedo standards. Wainwright v. Padgett, 5 Cir., 1966, 363 F.2d 822.

In obedience to our mandate, the District Court held another evidentiary hearing at which the appellant and other witnesses testified. The habeas corpus was then denied for the reason that the District Court found appellant’s signed statement of July 15, 1959, to have been voluntarily made. A review of this voluminous record convinces us that the judgment should be affirmed, Smith v. Heard, 5 Cir., 1963, 315 F.2d 692.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

387 F.2d 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-edward-padgett-v-louie-l-wainwright-director-division-of-ca5-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack