James Earl Holston v. Paul McKoy Finesse G. Couch Franklin Freeman W.R. Barker State of North Carolina

74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38830, 1996 WL 16817
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 18, 1996
Docket95-7565
StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.3d 1231 (James Earl Holston v. Paul McKoy Finesse G. Couch Franklin Freeman W.R. Barker State of North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Earl Holston v. Paul McKoy Finesse G. Couch Franklin Freeman W.R. Barker State of North Carolina, 74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38830, 1996 WL 16817 (4th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

74 F.3d 1231
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

James Earl HOLSTON, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Paul McKOY; Finesse G. Couch; Franklin Freeman; W.R.
Barker; State of North Carolina, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-7565.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Jan. 18, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-95-606-5-CT-H)

James Earl Holston, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Holston v. McKoy, No. CA-95-606-5-CT-H (E.D.N.C. Sept. 14, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38830, 1996 WL 16817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-earl-holston-v-paul-mckoy-finesse-g-couch-fr-ca4-1996.