James Earl Hardee v. Louis S. Nelson, Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin

407 F.2d 1315
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 9, 1969
Docket23003
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 407 F.2d 1315 (James Earl Hardee v. Louis S. Nelson, Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Earl Hardee v. Louis S. Nelson, Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin, 407 F.2d 1315 (9th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant alleges facts in support of his contentions: (1) that his confession was coerced;' and (2) that his guilty plea was induced by the confession. These allegations are quite different from those on which his earlier petition was based and entitle him to a hearing under Doran v. Wilson, 369 F.2d 505 (9th Cir. 1966).

The sufficiency of appellant’s allegations respecting the adequacy of his representation by counsel presents a close question. Since those allegations are closely related to his contentions respecting his plea we feel that the scope of his hearing should include them as well.

Reversed and remanded for hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

George X. Ramseur v. United States
425 F.2d 413 (Sixth Circuit, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
407 F.2d 1315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-earl-hardee-v-louis-s-nelson-warden-california-state-prison-at-ca9-1969.