James Earl Hardee v. Louis S. Nelson, Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin
This text of 407 F.2d 1315 (James Earl Hardee v. Louis S. Nelson, Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant alleges facts in support of his contentions: (1) that his confession was coerced;' and (2) that his guilty plea was induced by the confession. These allegations are quite different from those on which his earlier petition was based and entitle him to a hearing under Doran v. Wilson, 369 F.2d 505 (9th Cir. 1966).
The sufficiency of appellant’s allegations respecting the adequacy of his representation by counsel presents a close question. Since those allegations are closely related to his contentions respecting his plea we feel that the scope of his hearing should include them as well.
Reversed and remanded for hearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
407 F.2d 1315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-earl-hardee-v-louis-s-nelson-warden-california-state-prison-at-ca9-1969.