James E. Thompson v. State
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,__________________ September 18, 2013
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A14D0025. JAMES E. THOMPSON v. THE STATE.
James Thompson filed this application for discretionary appeal, seeking to challenge the trial court’s order dismissing his mandamus action. The Supreme Court, however, has exclusive appellate jurisdiction over all cases involving extraordinary remedies, including mandamus. See Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (5); Ladzinske v. Allen, 280 Ga. 264 (626 SE2d 83) (2006) (“‘[C]ases involving the grant or denial of mandamus are within the exclusive jurisdiction of [the Supreme] Court without regard to the underlying subject matter or the legal issues raised.’”). Accordingly, this case is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 09/18/2013 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James E. Thompson v. State (James E. Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.