James E. Suggs v. United States
397 F.2d 812
This text of 397 F.2d 812 (James E. Suggs v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
James E. Suggs v. United States, 397 F.2d 812 (5th Cir. 1968).
Opinion
We have carefully considered each ground of appeal asserted by appellant following his conviction for passing and possessing counterfeit f 10 bills. We conclude that as to no asserted error preserved for review did the trial court commit prejudicial error.
The Judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Duane Earl Pope v. United States
397 F.2d 812 (Eighth Circuit, 1968)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
397 F.2d 812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-e-suggs-v-united-states-ca5-1968.