James E. Suggs v. United States
397 F.2d 812
Opinion
We have carefully considered each ground of appeal asserted by appellant following his conviction for passing and possessing counterfeit f 10 bills. We conclude that as to no asserted error preserved for review did the trial court commit prejudicial error.
The Judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James E. Suggs v. United States, 397 F.2d 812 (5th Cir. 1968).
397 F.2d 812 (James E. Suggs v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Duane Earl Pope v. United States
397 F.2d 812 (Eighth Circuit, 1968)