James E Scott v. City of South Haven
This text of James E Scott v. City of South Haven (James E Scott v. City of South Haven) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
January 16, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
157867 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein JAMES E. SCOTT, STUART SCOTT, JOHN Elizabeth T. Clement SCOTT, WILLIAM SCOTT, MARY Megan K. Cavanagh, KATHERINE LAMB, ANNE SCOTT, and Justices MARY B. SCOTT, Petitioners-Appellants, v SC: 157867 COA: 339007 MTT: 15-003121-TT CITY OF SOUTH HAVEN, Respondent-Appellee.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 19, 2018 judgment the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. January 16, 2019 p0109 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James E Scott v. City of South Haven, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-e-scott-v-city-of-south-haven-mich-2019.