James E. Hoover v. Department of the Navy

39 F.3d 1195, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 37624, 1994 WL 558754
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in James E. Hoover v. Department of the Navy. Read the opinion of the Court — 957 F.2d 861
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided September 30, 1994·No. 94-3260·Unpublished

Opinion

39 F.3d 1195

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
James E. HOOVER, Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT Of the NAVY, Respondent.

No. 94-3260.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Sept. 30, 1994.

61 M.S.P.R. 151.

DISMISSED.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed.R.App.P. 42(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James E. Hoover v. Department of the Navy, 39 F.3d 1195, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 37624, 1994 WL 558754 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

39 F.3d 1195 (James E. Hoover v. Department of the Navy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kappler (Loretta M.) v. Merit Systems Protection Board
39 F.3d 1195 (Federal Circuit, 1994)