James E. Garrison v. The County of Bernalillo and the County of Santa Fe
338 F.2d 1002, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3664
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided December 8, 1964·No. 7863_1·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
The trial Court authorized the filing of this suit in forma pauperis against the Counties of Bernalillo and Santa Fe, New Mexico, as one cognizable under the Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. § 1983, R.S. § 1979). The trial Court dismissed the same without authorizing service, on the ground that the defendant counties were not within the ambit of the statute, as construed in Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167, 81 S.Ct. 473, 5 L.Ed.2d 492.
We agree, and 'the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James E. Garrison v. The County of Bernalillo and the County of Santa Fe, 338 F.2d 1002, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3664 (10th Cir. 1964).
338 F.2d 1002 (James E. Garrison v. The County of Bernalillo and the County of Santa Fe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States ex rel. Gittlemacker v. County of Philadelphia
413 F.2d 84 (Third Circuit, 1969)
United States Ex Rel. Jack Gittlemacker v. County Of Philadelphia
413 F.2d 84 (Third Circuit, 1969)
Shellburne, Inc. v. New Castle County
293 F. Supp. 237 (D. Delaware, 1968)
Homer Ray Brown v. Town of Caliente, Nevada and County of Lincoln, Nevada
392 F.2d 546 (Ninth Circuit, 1968)
Taylor v. Pennsylvania Board of Parole
263 F. Supp. 450 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1967)
National Labor Relations Board v. Insulating Fabricators, Inc., Southern Division
338 F.2d 1002 (Fourth Circuit, 1964)