James E. Finney v. John B. Metzger, Iiis., Charles Vester Delp, Jr. v. John B. Metzger, Iiis., Russell Shamburg v. John B. Metzger, Iii, Chairman, Virginia Parole Board Charlie Edwards, Virginia Parole Board Interviewer

45 F.3d 426, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40372
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 22, 1994
Docket94-7176
StatusPublished

This text of 45 F.3d 426 (James E. Finney v. John B. Metzger, Iiis., Charles Vester Delp, Jr. v. John B. Metzger, Iiis., Russell Shamburg v. John B. Metzger, Iii, Chairman, Virginia Parole Board Charlie Edwards, Virginia Parole Board Interviewer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James E. Finney v. John B. Metzger, Iiis., Charles Vester Delp, Jr. v. John B. Metzger, Iiis., Russell Shamburg v. John B. Metzger, Iii, Chairman, Virginia Parole Board Charlie Edwards, Virginia Parole Board Interviewer, 45 F.3d 426, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40372 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

45 F.3d 426
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

James E. FINNEY, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
John B. METZGER, III, et als., Defendant Appellee.
Charles Vester DELP, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
John B. METZGER, III, et als., Defendant Appellee.
Russell SHAMBURG, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
John B. METZGER, III, Chairman, Virginia Parole Board;
Charlie Edwards, Virginia Parole Board
Interviewer, Defendants Appellees.

Nos. 94-7176, 94-7179, 94-7194.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 17, 1994
Decided: December 22, 1994.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-94-833, CA-94-835, CA-94-841-R)

James E. Finney, Charles Vester Delp, Jr., Russell Shamburg, Appellants Pro Se.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's orders dismissing without prejudice their 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaints. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Finney v. Metzger, No. CA-94-833 (W.D.Va. Oct. 12, 1994); Delp v. Metzger, No. CA-94-835 (W.D.Va. Oct. 12, 1994); Shamburg v. Metzger, No. CA-94-841-R (W.D.Va. Oct. 12, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 F.3d 426, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-e-finney-v-john-b-metzger-iiis-charles-vester-delp-jr-v-john-ca4-1994.