James E. Eldridge and Orie T. Stewart v. United States

346 F.2d 186
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 14, 1965
Docket21503_1
StatusPublished

This text of 346 F.2d 186 (James E. Eldridge and Orie T. Stewart v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James E. Eldridge and Orie T. Stewart v. United States, 346 F.2d 186 (5th Cir. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The principal claim in this appeal is that the Government charged a conspiracy relating to 17 automobiles but proved one with respect to only 14. The failure of the Government fully to connect up the remaining three ears with these defendants is not such error as would warrant a reversal of a conviction because of the failure of the court to strike all evidence dealing with the three automobiles. There was uncontroverted evidence clearly connecting these appellants to the conspiracy charge. Their conviction was thus fully warranted.

The judgments are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
346 F.2d 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-e-eldridge-and-orie-t-stewart-v-united-states-ca5-1965.