James E. Eaton v. Trustmark National Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida

James E. Eaton v. Trustmark National Bank

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 24, 2017

Docket17-1338

StatusPublished

This text of James E. Eaton v. Trustmark National Bank (James E. Eaton v. Trustmark National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James E. Eaton v. Trustmark National Bank, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

JAMES E. EATON, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D17-1338

TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK,

Respondent.

___________________________/

Opinion filed August 9, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari – Original Jurisdiction.

Stephen MacNamara, Tallahassee; Daniel W. Uhlfelder and Nicola J. Pappas of Daniel W. Uhlfelder, P.A., Santa Rosa Beach, for Petitioner.

Oscar J. Locklin of Locklin, Saba, Locklin & Jones, P.A., Pace, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

ROBERTS, OSTERHAUS, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI