James E. Cunningham v. Jim Rose, Warden

476 F.2d 1285, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9898
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided May 17, 1973·No. 72-1954·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the denial of a writ of habeas corpus. The appellant was convicted of rape. The jury imposed the death sentence which was commuted to a 99-year term by the Governor of Tennessee.

All the issues presented were carefully considered by District Judge Frank W. Wilson, and disposed of in a carefully *1286 prepared opinion. Judge Wilson concluded in his opinion that the admission of the confessions of each of the four defendants was error within the meaning of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968), but that such error was harmless. Schneble v. Florida, 405 U.S. 427, 92 S.Ct. 1056, 31 L.Ed.2d 340 (1972).

We are not satisfied that the use of the confessions under the circumstances of this case was in fact error within the meaning of Bruton, but conclude that if there was such error the District Judge was eminently correct in concluding that on this trial record the error was harmless.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James E. Cunningham v. Jim Rose, Warden, 476 F.2d 1285, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9898 (6th Cir. 1973).

476 F.2d 1285 (James E. Cunningham v. Jim Rose, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bruton v. United States
391 U.S. 123 (Supreme Court, 1968)
Schneble v. Florida
405 U.S. 427 (Supreme Court, 1972)