James E. Carley, M.D., P.A. v. Seibels, Bruce & Co.

488 So. 2d 140, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1069, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7722
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 8, 1986·No. No. 85-1131·Published

Opinion

COWART, Judge.

An employee in the course and scope of his employment was injured by a tortfeasor with liability insurance. While receiving worker’s compensation benefits the injured employee settled with the tortfeasor’s insurer.1 The worker’s compensation carrier sued the tortfeasor’s liability carrier alleging that the settlement was in violation of the compensation carrier’s statutory subro-gation rights in that the liability carrier “had actual or constructive knowledge” that the injured employee was receiving compensation benefits when the settlement was made. Upon motion of the liability carrier, the trial court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a cause of action because it failed to allege that the compensation carrier had “given written notice of [its] right of subrogation to the third-party tortfeasor” as required by section 440.-39(3)(b), Florida Statutes. We affirm the dismissal.

The worker’s compensation carrier argues that it was the intent of the legislature to provide the compensation carrier a statutory right of subrogation; that it was wrong for the liability carrier to settle with the injured employee knowing the compensation carrier had subrogation rights in and to the settlement proceeds, and that, to effectuate the intent of the legislature and to remedy that wrong, this court should “interpret” or “construe” the word “written” out of the statute or read it to mean that “actual or constructive” notice or knowledge is sufficient. We decline this invitation to “do justice” in deference to our judicial duty to follow the statute as the legislature has clearly written it. The compensation carrier argues that the statute works an injustice by its formalistic requirement of “written notice.” That argument should be made to the legislature.

AFFIRMED.

COBB, C.J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James E. Carley, M.D., P.A. v. Seibels, Bruce & Co., 488 So. 2d 140, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1069, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7722 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

488 So. 2d 140 (James E. Carley, M.D., P.A. v. Seibels, Bruce & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ASJ Drugs, Inc. v. Berkowitz
459 So. 2d 348 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Shelby Mutual Insurance v. Russell
137 So. 2d 219 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1962)
Brown v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
281 So. 2d 364 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)