James E. Baker v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

Fifth Circuit

James E. Baker v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

476 F.2d 1281, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9966

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 14, 1973

Docket72-2471

StatusPublished

This text of 476 F.2d 1281 (James E. Baker v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James E. Baker v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, 476 F.2d 1281, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9966 (5th Cir. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

The Court on its own motion having determined to consider this cause en banc,

It is ordered that the submission of this cause to a panel of Judges Goldberg, *1282 Ainsworth and Ingraham on December 6, 1972 is hereby vacated, and that the above entitled cause shall be heard en banc on briefs with oral argument at a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk shall set a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT:

The Court on its own motion having determined to consider this cause en banc,

It is ordered that the submission of this cause to a panel of Judges Goldberg, *1282 Ainsworth and Ingraham on December 6, 1972 is hereby vacated, and that the above entitled cause shall be heard en banc on briefs with oral argument at a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk shall set a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

476 F.2d 1281, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-e-baker-v-dr-george-j-beto-director-texas-department-of-ca5-1973.