James E. Akins v. Federal Election Commission

D.C. Circuit

James E. Akins v. Federal Election Commission

74 F.3d 287, 315 U.S. App. D.C. 384, 1996 WL 37640

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided January 25, 1996·No. 94-5088·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellants’ suggestion for rehearing in banc and of the response thereto, it is

ORDERED, by the Court in banc, that the suggestion is granted. This case will be considered and decided by the court sitting in banc on both the standing and statutory construction issues. It is

FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court in banc, that the judgment filed herein on September 29,1995 is hereby vacated.

A future order will govern further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellants’ suggestion for rehearing in banc and of the response thereto, it is

ORDERED, by the Court in banc, that the suggestion is granted. This case will be considered and decided by the court sitting in banc on both the standing and statutory construction issues. It is

FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court in banc, that the judgment filed herein on September 29,1995 is hereby vacated.

A future order will govern further proceedings.

James E. Akins v. Federal Election Commission, 74 F.3d 287, 315 U.S. App. D.C. 384, 1996 WL 37640 (D.C. Cir. 1996).

Pincite

74 F.3d 287 (James E. Akins v. Federal Election Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related