James Dora, Jr. v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 14, 2022·No. 07-21-00293-CR·Published

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-21-00293-CR

JAMES DORA, JR., APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 137th District Court Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019-417,316, Honorable John J. "Trey" McClendon III, Presiding

October 14, 2022 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J, and PARKER and DOSS, JJ.

Appellant James Dora, Jr. appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery 1 and

sentence to forty-five years’ confinement. The appellate record has been filed and

Appellant’s brief was due October 5, 2022. Now pending before this Court is the motion

of Appellant’s appointed counsel, Lane A Haygood, requesting that we permit him to

withdraw from representation prior to filing Appellant’s brief and remand the cause to the

1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 29.03. trial court to determine whether new counsel should be appointed. In the motion,

Haygood states that Appellant is “dissatisfied with appointed counsel’s representation”

and that “[c]ommunication between counsel and client has broken down to the point that

it frustrates the ends of representation.”

Because the trial court has responsibility for appointing counsel to represent

indigent defendants in criminal cases as well as the authority to relieve or replace

appointed counsel, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court to rule

on counsel’s motion to withdraw. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. arts. 1.051(d),

26.04(j)(2); Enriquez v. State, 999 S.W.2d 906, 907–08 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, order).

Upon remand, the trial court shall determine (1) whether Appellant still desires to

prosecute the appeal; (2) whether to grant Appellant’s counsel’s motion to withdraw; and

(3) if the motion to withdraw is granted, whether Appellant is indigent and entitled to

appointment of new counsel. See TEX. CODE CRIM PROC. ANN. arts. 1.051(d), 26.04(j)(2);

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(g). If the trial court grants the motion to withdraw and appoints

Appellant new counsel; the name, address, email address, phone number, and State Bar

number of any newly-appointed counsel shall be included in the Court’s findings. The

trial court may also enter such orders necessary to address the aforementioned

questions. The trial court’s findings and any orders issued shall be included in a

supplemental clerk’s record to be filed with this Court by November 14, 2022.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Dora, Jr. v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

James Dora, Jr. v. the State of Texas (James Dora, Jr. v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Enriquez v. State
999 S.W.2d 906 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)