James Dinkins v. State Farm General Insurance Company

C.D. California

James Dinkins v. State Farm General Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California·Decided November 30, 2022·No. 2:22-cv-00295·Unknown

Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-00295-FMO-PVC Document 24 Filed 11/30/22 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:109

JS-6 JAMES DINKINS, et al., ) Case No. CV 22-0295 FMO (PVCx) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, (Dkt. 23, Notice of Settlement), IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown by no later than December 30, 2022, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962). Dated this 30th day of November, 2022. /s/ Fernando M. Olguin United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Case 2:22-cv-00295-FMO-PVC Document 24 Filed 11/30/22 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:109

JS-6 JAMES DINKINS, et al., ) Case No. CV 22-0295 FMO (PVCx) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, (Dkt. 23, Notice of Settlement), IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown by no later than December 30, 2022, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962). Dated this 30th day of November, 2022. /s/ Fernando M. Olguin United States District Judge

James Dinkins v. State Farm General Insurance Company, (C.D. Cal. 2022).

Pincite

James Dinkins v. State Farm General Insurance Company (James Dinkins v. State Farm General Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related